I: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001. [PubMed: 19190721] Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis

I: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001. [PubMed: 19190721] Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis MH. Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32(25):8443?453. doi: 10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012. [PubMed: 22723684] Sonderegger, M.; Yu, A. A rational account of perceptual compensation for coarticulation. In: Ohlsson, S.; Camtrabone, R., editors. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Portland, OR: Cognitive Science Society; 2010. p. 375-380. Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Trueswell JC, Tanenhaus MK. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1993; 47(2):276?09. doi: 10.1037/h0078826. [PubMed: 8364532] Stanovich KE, West RF. Mechanisms of purchase Aprotinin sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory and Cognition. 1979; 7:77?5. doi: 10.3758/BF03197588. Stanovich KE, West RF. The effect of a sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a twoprocess theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1981; 7:658?72. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.3.658. Stanovich KE, West RF. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1983; 112(1):1?6. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.1. [PubMed: 6221061] Staub A. The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2015; 9(8):311?27. doi: 10.1111/ lnc3.12151. Staub A, Grant M, Astheimer L, Cohen A. The influence of cloze probability and item constraint on cloze task response time. Journal of Memory and Language. 2015; 82:1?7. doi: 10.1016/j.jml. 2015.02.004. Stilp CE, Kluender KR. Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of UNC0642 biological activity America. 2010; 107(27):12387?2392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913625107. [PubMed: 20566842] Stivers T, Enfield NJ, Brown P, Englert C, Hayashi M, Heinemann T, Levinson SC. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(26):10587?0592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. Sussman, RS. Processing and representation of verbs: Insights from instruments. University of Rochester; 2006. Ph.D. Doctoral dissertation Swinney DA. Lexical access during sentence comprehension:(Re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979; 18(6):645?59. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5371(79)90355-4. Szostak CM, Pitt MA. The prolonged influence of subsequent context on spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception Psychophysics. 2013; 75(7):1533?546. doi: 10.3758/ s13414-013-0492-3. Tanenhaus MK, Brown-Schmidt S. Language processing in the natural world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2008; 363(1493):1105?1122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2162. [PubMed: 17895223] Tanenhaus, MK.; Chambers, CG.; Hanna, JE. Referential domains in spoken language comprehension: Using eye movements to bridge the product and action traditions. In: Henderson, JM.; Ferreira,Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageF., editors. The Interface of Language, Vision, and.I: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001. [PubMed: 19190721] Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis MH. Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32(25):8443?453. doi: 10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012. [PubMed: 22723684] Sonderegger, M.; Yu, A. A rational account of perceptual compensation for coarticulation. In: Ohlsson, S.; Camtrabone, R., editors. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Portland, OR: Cognitive Science Society; 2010. p. 375-380. Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Trueswell JC, Tanenhaus MK. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1993; 47(2):276?09. doi: 10.1037/h0078826. [PubMed: 8364532] Stanovich KE, West RF. Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory and Cognition. 1979; 7:77?5. doi: 10.3758/BF03197588. Stanovich KE, West RF. The effect of a sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a twoprocess theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1981; 7:658?72. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.3.658. Stanovich KE, West RF. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1983; 112(1):1?6. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.1. [PubMed: 6221061] Staub A. The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2015; 9(8):311?27. doi: 10.1111/ lnc3.12151. Staub A, Grant M, Astheimer L, Cohen A. The influence of cloze probability and item constraint on cloze task response time. Journal of Memory and Language. 2015; 82:1?7. doi: 10.1016/j.jml. 2015.02.004. Stilp CE, Kluender KR. Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010; 107(27):12387?2392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913625107. [PubMed: 20566842] Stivers T, Enfield NJ, Brown P, Englert C, Hayashi M, Heinemann T, Levinson SC. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(26):10587?0592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. Sussman, RS. Processing and representation of verbs: Insights from instruments. University of Rochester; 2006. Ph.D. Doctoral dissertation Swinney DA. Lexical access during sentence comprehension:(Re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979; 18(6):645?59. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5371(79)90355-4. Szostak CM, Pitt MA. The prolonged influence of subsequent context on spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception Psychophysics. 2013; 75(7):1533?546. doi: 10.3758/ s13414-013-0492-3. Tanenhaus MK, Brown-Schmidt S. Language processing in the natural world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2008; 363(1493):1105?1122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2162. [PubMed: 17895223] Tanenhaus, MK.; Chambers, CG.; Hanna, JE. Referential domains in spoken language comprehension: Using eye movements to bridge the product and action traditions. In: Henderson, JM.; Ferreira,Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageF., editors. The Interface of Language, Vision, and.

Leave a Reply