S within the TLC transcripts had been normally significant (uncorrected and ungrammatical) and never minor (corrected and constant using the syntactic class regularity). The mean variety of main CC violations was 2.22 per response for H.M. versus 0.13 for the controls (SD = 0.20), a reputable ten.43 SD difference. four.2.1.2. Key Omission-Type CC Violations Table 4 provides a full list of significant omission-type CC violations for H.M. as well as the controls in Study 2, classified by the syntactic category in the units involved. H.M. developed 0.50 omission-type CC violations per response, versus a mean of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.ten), a trustworthy four.90 SD GS-4997 site distinction. 4.two.1.3. Important Commission-Type CC Violations Table five provides a total list of big commission-type CC 
violations for H.M. and the controls, classified by syntactic category of your units involved. H.M. produced 1.35 commission-type CC violations per response versus a mean of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.04), a dependable 33.50 SD deficit.Brain Sci. 2013, three Table 4. Key omission-type violations of conjunction constraints (CCs) involving determiners, nouns, noun phrases (NPs), and verb modifiers in Study 2 organized by type of constraint.Significant Violations of Determiner-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Is it crowded and it just pointed out this bus is up here and it really is crowded college bus.” (BPC: a crowded college bus) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a for the NP a crowded college bus] H.M.: “If they don’t use legs like he does … and his hands, they could fall.” (determiner BPC: use their legs) [H.M. failed to conjoin the pronominal determiner their towards the NP their legs] H.M.: “it’s on widespread street…” (determiner BPC: on a typical street) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a towards the NP a frequent street] H.M.: “Well he’s placing the price tag of it and price tag of point what it’s…” (determiner BPC: as well as the cost of X (this) thing) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner the for the NP the price] H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to view what lady’s using to pull himself up apart from his hands.” (determiner BPC: to view what this lady’s using) [H.M. failed to conjoin the demonstrative determiner this for the NP this lady] Manage participant: “Salesman’s speaking to…” (BPC: a or the salesman’s talking to) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner towards the NP a or the salesman] H.M.: “I want a number of that pie either some pie and I’ll have some.” (BPC: and I’ll have some X (cake)) [H.M. failed to conjoin the noun cake for the determiner some in the NP some cake] Handle participant: “Woman’s telling the baker…” PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338362 (BPC: a or this woman’s telling…) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner to the NP a or the woman] Key Violations of Verb-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Well you–she wants a single issue and he desires another issue and also the fresh are not–are not. Does not say that, it says not.” (BPC: the fresh fruit are not) H.M.: “He had this (inaudible) … no, she’s taking that suit and he wants to take it … and he’s trying to sell.” (BPC: trying to sell it or that suit) [H.M. failed to conjoin an object to a VP for instance sell it or sell that suit] Control participant: “This person is showing the lady who’s gonna sit.” (BPC: this individual is displaying the sign for the lady who’s gonna sit) [This participant failed to conjoin an object to the VP is showing in addition to a preposition to the lady] Main Violations of Preposition-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Before initially you cross across.” (BPC: you.