Be discovered elsewhere [3,11].CivilEng 2021,Table three. Cont.Specimen S.S0.2L M.S0.2L L.S0.2L S.S1.1L M.S1.1L L.S1.1L S.S1.2L M.S1.2L L.S1.2L d (mm) 175 350 525 175 350 525 175 350 525 b (mm) 95 152 275 95 152 275 95 152 275 fc (MPa) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 w three.six three.7 three.six 3.six 3.7 3.six 3.six three.7 3.6 s 0 0 0 0.37 0.38 0.41 0.37 0.38 0.41 Strengthening Configuration Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap U-wrap Layers 2 two two 1 1 1 2 2 two wFRP (mm) tFRP (mm) 0.132 0.214 0.334 0.066 0.107 0.167 0.132 0.214 0.334 FRP 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.24 EFRP (MPa) 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 231,000 FRPu 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.four 1.4 1.4 1.four 1.4 VFRP (kN) 32 40 144 three 0 0 12 four 30 Vr (kN) 71 127 326 98 260 590 107 272 629 n Loss (MPa) 0.78 0.44 0.41 1.08 0.89 0.75 1.18 0.93 0.80 44 47 17 31 21Group 2–Shear-Strengthened with CFRP L-Shape Sulfadimethoxine 13C6 Technical Information Laminates M.S1.Str L.S1.Str M.S1. Str-Anc L.S1. Str-Anc 350 525 350 525 152 275 152 275 30 30 30 30 three.7 3.six three.7 three.six 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.41 Laminate Laminate Laminate Laminate U-wrap U-wrap U+A U+A 1 1 1 1 40 40 40 40 2 two 2 two 0.six 0.6 0.six 0.six 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 1.3 1.three 1.three 1.3 37 30 98 90 275 630 336 690 0.94 0.80 1.15 0.87 16 Note: Cont = continuous CFRP sheet configuration, Laminate = precured CFRP laminate, U + A = U-wrap configuration with anchorage system in compression zone (flange).Table four. Properties of the CFRP material utilised. Home CFRP Sheet for Group 1 tensile strength, fFRPu (MPa) Modulus of elasticity, EFRP (GPa) Elongation at break, FRPu CFRP L-shape Laminates for Group 2 Tensile strength, fFRPu (MPa) Modulus of elasticity, EFRP (GPa) Elongation at break, FRPu 1350 90 1.3 3650 231 1.4 Value5. Experimental Test Results Table 3 contains the experimental details and specimen test benefits related with groups 1 and two. It includes specimen geometry (d and b), components ratio (w and s ), strengthening configuration and material properties (wFRP , tFRP , FRP , EFRP , FRPu ), contribution of CFRP (sheet or L-shaped laminate) to shear resistance (VFRP ), total nominal shear resistance (Vn ), normalized nominal shear strength at failure (vn = Vn /bd f c ), and also the loss in shear strength with respect for the smallest beams (loss in vn ). Note that the width in the cross-section has no influence on the size effect ATP disodium Biological Activity Because it has been shown by [28]. Consequently, the width on the specimens will not be considered in the discussion from the experimental final results. The failure mode of all tested specimens was in shear, with diagonal tensile fracture of concrete. The crack pattern of specimens without the need of transverse steel showed a single crack, as illustrated in Figure 4a, whereas quite a few cracks accompanying the primary central crack characterized the specimens with internal steel stirrups (Figure 4b) no matter the CFRP strengthening material (sheet or L-shaped laminate). Table 3 shows a maximum shear acquire on account of EB-CFRP sheet within a specimen with no internal steel stirrups (S.S0.2L) of 84 , compared with 13 in a specimen with internal steel stirrups (S.S1.2L). Because these two specimens were of the same size (compact), this outcome reveals a significant reduce in EB-CFRP shear get as a consequence of the presence of steel stirrups. Similar results were observed within a study carried out on strengthened RC beams with EB-CFRP by [7]. In specimens with EB-CFRP L-shaped laminate, the maximum shear obtain was 16 in (M.S1.Str), but this enhanced.