Educing terms from Inside the following, examples models for conventional RC beams ([25,325]). All some shear resistance predictionof size effect consideration by some codes for the design these of standard RC structures are to helpful beam depth together with the aim of only the terms are inversely proportional presented. Note that the size effect influences correcting the concrete contribution to shear the size effect. shear resistance to account for resistance. Hence, the size effect correction (reduction)Decreasing termsReducing terms230/(1000 + )230/(1000 + dv )Table 1. Size impact decreasing terms from prediction models. 0.4 1/1 + 200/CSA-A23.3-14 (2014) [18]1+ d Figure 2 illustrates the behaviour from the reducing terms from Table 0.004.d a function of 1 as beam size. It shows that the curves decrease because the beam size increases. That is vital becauseFigure two illustrates the behaviour of impact is accounted for Table 1 asmodels. The curves it clearly indicates that the size the minimizing terms from in these a function of beam size. It shows that the curves decrease as the beam size increases. This is important start off using a incredibly sharp reduce up to a beam height of about 1000 mm. For effective since it clearly indicates that the size effect is accounted for in these models. The curves depths greater than 1000 mm, the to a beam height out, and their slopes steadily reduce. curves flatten of about 1000 mm. For effective depths begin using a incredibly sharp decrease up According to these curves, thecan also be concluded that RCgraduallyexhibit a Depending on it curves flatten out, and their slopes beams decrease. considerable size greater than 1000 mm, impact when d it1000also be In contrast, the size effect loses considerably ofsize effect when these curves, can mm. concluded that RC beams exhibit a significant its impact when d d 1000 1000 mm. mm. In contrast, the size effect loses much of its influence when d 1000 mm.EC2-2004 [24] 1 + 200/Fulvestrant Cancer dBS-8110 (1997) [15]0.4 1/()-1/JSCE (2001) [28] d-1/2 1 + 0.004. ACI-318-19 (2019) [1]0.CSA-A23.3-1.EC2-+/ +0.1.0.1.0 0 1000 d (mm) 0.4 20001 0 1000 d (mm) 0.four 2000BS-8110-0.JSCE0..-/0.two 0.1 0 0 1000 d (mm) 20000.two 0.1 0 0 1000 d (mm) 2000Figure 2. Cont.CivilEng FOR PEER Evaluation CivilEng 2021, two, 2021,1.five 1.ACI-318-+ .0.9 0.six 0.3 0 0 1000 d (mm) 2000Figure 2. Lowering terms evolution according escalating beam size. Figure 2. Decreasing terms evolution according toto rising beam size.four. Experimental Tests four. Experimental TestsThe experimental plan involved six series of geometrically comparable RC T-beams The experimental program involved six series of geometrically similar RC T-beams shear-strengthened with EB carbon FRP (EB-CFRP) divided into two groups to assess the shear-strengthened2). Study parameters in (EB-CFRP) divided into two groups to assess the size effect (Table with EB carbon FRP the first group (strengthened with continuous sizeCFRP sheet) were the influence from the steel stirrups along with the increase in the CFRP rigidity, effect (Table 2). Study parameters in the first group (strengthened with continuous whereas within the second group (strengthened with CFRP and the strips), the study Ionomycin Purity & Documentation parameCFRP sheet) have been the influence with the steel stirrupslaminates improve in the CFRP rigidity, ters had been the second in the (strengthened with CFRP laminates use of a proven whereas within the influencegroupuse on the CFRP L-shaped laminate and thestrips), the study paanchorage method. Note that the experimental rameters were t.