Educing terms from Inside the following, examples models for traditional RC beams ([25,325]). All some shear resistance predictionof size impact consideration by some codes for the style these of traditional RC structures are to efficient beam depth with all the aim of only the terms are inversely proportional presented. Note that the size impact influences correcting the concrete contribution to shear the size effect. shear resistance to account for resistance. Thus, the size impact correction (reduction)Lowering termsReducing terms230/(1000 + )230/(1000 + dv )Table 1. Size PD-168077 Protocol effect minimizing terms from prediction models. 0.four 1/1 + 200/CSA-A23.3-14 (2014) [18]1+ d A 83-01 supplier Figure two illustrates the behaviour of the reducing terms from Table 0.004.d a function of 1 as beam size. It shows that the curves reduce because the beam size increases. This really is crucial becauseFigure 2 illustrates the behaviour of impact is accounted for Table 1 asmodels. The curves it clearly indicates that the size the lowering terms from in these a function of beam size. It shows that the curves lower as the beam size increases. This really is critical start out having a extremely sharp reduce as much as a beam height of about 1000 mm. For efficient since it clearly indicates that the size impact is accounted for in these models. The curves depths greater than 1000 mm, the to a beam height out, and their slopes progressively decrease. curves flatten of about 1000 mm. For effective depths start with a pretty sharp lower up Determined by these curves, thecan also be concluded that RCgraduallyexhibit a According to it curves flatten out, and their slopes beams lower. considerable size greater than 1000 mm, effect when d it1000also be In contrast, the size effect loses much ofsize effect when these curves, can mm. concluded that RC beams exhibit a important its influence when d d 1000 1000 mm. mm. In contrast, the size effect loses a great deal of its impact when d 1000 mm.EC2-2004 [24] 1 + 200/dBS-8110 (1997) [15]0.4 1/()-1/JSCE (2001) [28] d-1/2 1 + 0.004. ACI-318-19 (2019) [1]0.CSA-A23.3-1.EC2-+/ +0.1.0.1.0 0 1000 d (mm) 0.four 20001 0 1000 d (mm) 0.4 2000BS-8110-0.JSCE0..-/0.2 0.1 0 0 1000 d (mm) 20000.two 0.1 0 0 1000 d (mm) 2000Figure two. Cont.CivilEng FOR PEER Review CivilEng 2021, two, 2021,1.five 1.ACI-318-+ .0.9 0.6 0.three 0 0 1000 d (mm) 2000Figure two. Reducing terms evolution according rising beam size. Figure 2. Minimizing terms evolution according toto rising beam size.4. Experimental Tests four. Experimental TestsThe experimental program involved six series of geometrically similar RC T-beams The experimental plan involved six series of geometrically comparable RC T-beams shear-strengthened with EB carbon FRP (EB-CFRP) divided into two groups to assess the shear-strengthened2). Study parameters in (EB-CFRP) divided into two groups to assess the size impact (Table with EB carbon FRP the first group (strengthened with continuous sizeCFRP sheet) had been the influence on the steel stirrups as well as the enhance inside the CFRP rigidity, effect (Table two). Study parameters within the 1st group (strengthened with continuous whereas in the second group (strengthened with CFRP plus the strips), the study parameCFRP sheet) had been the influence on the steel stirrupslaminates improve within the CFRP rigidity, ters have been the second of your (strengthened with CFRP laminates use of a verified whereas in the influencegroupuse in the CFRP L-shaped laminate and thestrips), the study paanchorage method. Note that the experimental rameters had been t.